<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Easy Drug Rehabilitation &#187; actual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/tag/actual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com</link>
	<description>Drug Rehabilitation, Made Easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does anyone know what the actual cutoff in nanograms is for methamphetamines? Is it 50 ng?</title>
		<link>http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/31/does-anyone-know-what-the-actual-cutoff-in-nanograms-is-for-methamphetamines-is-it-50-ng/</link>
		<comments>http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/31/does-anyone-know-what-the-actual-cutoff-in-nanograms-is-for-methamphetamines-is-it-50-ng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Easy Drug Rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anyone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methamphetamines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanograms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/31/does-anyone-know-what-the-actual-cutoff-in-nanograms-is-for-methamphetamines-is-it-50-ng/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question by rhonda w: Does anyone know what the actual cutoff in nanograms is for methamphetamines? Is it 50 ng? Best answer: Answer by Apple Juiceum wrong section? this section is not allowed to do drugs. This section gets randomly drug tested. Add your own answer in the comments!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><i>Question by rhonda w</i>: Does anyone know what the actual cutoff in nanograms is for methamphetamines? Is it 50 ng?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Best answer:</strong></p>
<p><i>Answer by Apple Juice</i><br />um wrong section? this section is not allowed to do drugs. This section gets randomly drug tested.</p>
<p><strong>Add your own answer in the comments!</strong></p>
<div style="padding:5px 0 5px 0; text-align:center; float:center;"><a style="padding:4px 4px 4px 4px;border:0;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6448261521327628";
/* 468x60, created 1/1/10 */
google_ad_slot = "8603028309";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></a><br /></div><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.easydrugrehabilitation.com%2F31%2Fdoes-anyone-know-what-the-actual-cutoff-in-nanograms-is-for-methamphetamines-is-it-50-ng%2F&amp;linkname=Does%20anyone%20know%20what%20the%20actual%20cutoff%20in%20nanograms%20is%20for%20methamphetamines%3F%20Is%20it%2050%20ng%3F"><img src="http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/31/does-anyone-know-what-the-actual-cutoff-in-nanograms-is-for-methamphetamines-is-it-50-ng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Chance New Mexico&#8217;s actual &#8216;success rate&#8217; is negative: here is why</title>
		<link>http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/18/second-chance-new-mexicos-actual-success-rate-is-negative-here-is-why/</link>
		<comments>http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/18/second-chance-new-mexicos-actual-success-rate-is-negative-here-is-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[here]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/2010/03/18/second-chance-new-mexicos-actual-success-rate-is-negative-here-is-why/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this video I said &#8220;&#8230; 32 went back to prison.&#8221; I should have said &#8220;32%, which is 28 of them, went back to prison.&#8221; This video explains why the Scientology front group &#8216;Second Chance&#8217; does WORSE at keeping prison convicts out of prison than having no interdiction program at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1YAFr13yDiY?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1YAFr13yDiY?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
In this video I said &#8220;&#8230; 32 went back to prison.&#8221; I should have said &#8220;32%, which is 28 of them, went back to prison.&#8221; This video explains why the Scientology front group &#8216;Second Chance&#8217; does WORSE at keeping prison convicts out of prison than having no interdiction program at all.</p>
<div style="padding:5px 0 5px 0; text-align:center; float:center;"><a style="padding:4px 4px 4px 4px;border:0;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6448261521327628";
/* 468x60, created 1/1/10 */
google_ad_slot = "8603028309";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></a><br /></div><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.easydrugrehabilitation.com%2F18%2Fsecond-chance-new-mexicos-actual-success-rate-is-negative-here-is-why%2F&amp;linkname=Second%20Chance%20New%20Mexico%26%238217%3Bs%20actual%20%26%238216%3Bsuccess%20rate%26%238217%3B%20is%20negative%3A%20here%20is%20why"><img src="http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.easydrugrehabilitation.com/18/second-chance-new-mexicos-actual-success-rate-is-negative-here-is-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

