Racist Anti-Drug PSA

July 26, 2010 - 12:59 pm 25 Comments

The Partnership for a Drug-Free America clears up any question about the latent racism of the war on drugs in this 1991 public service announcement. SuperFurryAnthony.blogspot.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5

  • Share/Bookmark

25 Responses to “Racist Anti-Drug PSA”

  1. CalyxAsgard Says:

    I can see what they tried to do with this ad, was it in any way successful?

  2. Keihzaru Says:

    don’t you love how is the people outside of the represented group that find thing racist? Like with RE5, I didn’t see any black person offended by the Black zombies in a game set in Africa.

  3. TheHotbod89 Says:

    @A86 – im native american and i think its a good statement on how the black civilization should show more respect to the struggles of there ancestors by empowering their race with positive standards and good upbringing and staying clear away from things that the white man clearly made available to them just to corrupt their race.

  4. FutureLaugh Says:

    @A86 right on!!!

  5. A86 Says:

    @FutureLaugh – Exactly! I don’t see how this ad is racist. Drug addiction IS a form of personal slavery. An ad racist against black people would be encouraging black to STAY ON DRUGS. A racist would want black people to stay in bondage and f**k up their lives.

  6. unbiased000 Says:

    this isnt racist! this is actually a good video from a racial standpoint. if only it mentioned how crack was brought into the country by the cia and put in black neighborhoods on purpose. (oh yeah bitches dont deny BEFORE you ask me for proof cuz i got it)

  7. lovedarkpassion Says:

    Im black and its just a little racist with a good point. I dont care what any one else thinks im LMAO

  8. FutureLaugh Says:

    @A86 exactly!!!! this message was on point, how is it racist? Crack was engineered by the government to enslave minorities! Thanks to the war on drugs, 1 and 3 black men are in the system- modern day slavery!

  9. socer777 Says:

    @buprenorphed You are making a lot of assumptions. You said something stupid. I pointed it out, and blamed your stupidity on the heroin.

  10. buprenorphed Says:

    @socer777 Anyone who has done it enough would not say its not that bad. But again, potatos can kill you, whats bad/good is relative, so, compared to for example the holocaust its really not that bad. On another hand, you dont seem to know much about heroin so even though saying something like ‘its not that bad’ happens to be a naive thing to say,you wouldnt know that unless you knew the slightst thing about heroin.It cant make u delusional even if it tried, its not psychadelic,its a painkiller.

  11. buprenorphed Says:

    @mussman717word Everything you said was 100% true and accurate untill i read the second word before last. That made me reevaluate what kind of knowledge/common sense (actually doublethink) someone who wrote that could have. I dont think you would understand if i explained so ill leave it.

  12. socer777 Says:

    @tumadoireacht I apologize for leaving three comments to your one, but I thought you’d like to know that LSD is not correlated with birth defects.

  13. socer777 Says:

    @tumadoireacht Sorry, I can’t understand the point you were trying to make with your final comment. Are you stating that women who have taken LSD in the past have a greater risk of giving birth to children with defects? Or that taking LSD while pregnant causes birth defects? Would you mind finishing the thought?

  14. socer777 Says:

    @tumadoireacht True, cell phones do not cook your brain. False, cigarettes have been linked to cancer (though I don’t see how any of this has anything to do with the topic at hand. LSD causing great insights is a matter of perspective, though again very little relevance to the issue we are discussing. In fact everything but the last sentence is off topic.

  15. tumadoireacht Says:

    @socer777 mobile phones do not cause cooked brains/cigarettes are not causally linked to cancer/ lsd gives great insights and superior mental health and trippers are now running world affairs using the insights from their trips.
    birth defects amongst lsd mums are ……. oops

  16. socer777 Says:

    @tumadoireacht Poor choice of words on my part, I admit. I am officially stating that LSD, like every other drug, causes chromosomal damage. I am also officially stating that the damage done is negligible. Now there is simply the matter of you not reading the very article you recommended to me.

  17. tumadoireacht Says:

    @socer777 be careful -you are already contradicting your earlier statement

  18. tumadoireacht Says:

    @jjjooommm222 you sound like you have actually done some reading

  19. socer777 Says:

    @tumadoireacht PS: Read further than the first three sentences of an article before you act like an expert.

  20. socer777 Says:

    @tumadoireacht Are you talking about the claims of LSD causing chromosome damage? It is true, it does, but so does virtually every drug known to man. If fact, caffeine causes chromosomal damage, and to a greater extent than LSD.

  21. chopseh Says:

    That’ adds true though. Drugs make you a slave to the white hispanic drug dealers of Columbia.

  22. tumadoireacht Says:

    google it -dishotsky is the main reference article but there are several others -the hippy legends about how benign lsd and pot are always get a big bitter laugh in science circles-google dna lsd damage and see for yourself

  23. socer777 Says:

    @tumadoireacht LSD does not damage your DNA. That’s BS. Facts or GTFO.

  24. socer777 Says:

    @jjjooommm222 Dude did you seriously say that heroin isn’t that bad? Jesus man have you done it so much that you lost all connection with reality?

  25. michaelHda Says:

    Racist? nah……………I bet black people produced this. Addiction IS slavery……..